The FAST (Free Ad-Supported Streaming TV) channels ecosystem is experiencing a paradoxical growth. On one hand, there is an explosion of content and platforms catering to diverse audiences. On the other hand, the ecosystem’s evolution is hampered by the multitude of independent companies entrenched in the current model, each profiting from various aspects of the service chain—from ad-fill, ad decisioning and Content Delivery Networks (CDN) to Server-Side Ad Insertion (SSAI) and AI-driven advertising yield optimization.

These companies charge preferential Software as a Service (SaaS) fees, creating a complex web of financial dependencies that disincentivizes change. The result is a status quo where each entity benefits from the inefficiencies of the system. The primary issue—creating a sustainable, creator-friendly ecosystem—remains unaddressed as it does require a YouTube approach and the independent parties are not wanting to take on the challenge. The motivation to innovate and streamline is dampened by the short-term gains these companies make from the existing fragmented and often opaque market structure.

In essence, the FAST channels ecosystem is caught in a cycle where the very players that could drive change are the ones benefiting from its slow pace. This creates a challenging environment for content creators who seek a fair and transparent path to monetization. Until there is a collective shift towards a more unified and equitable model, the ecosystem will continue to be characterized by its sluggish transformation, despite the dynamic content landscape it supports.

Check out Kapang on the new walled garden approach –

FAST Channels – Why does it need to change, nobody said, and why now?, View TV